Archive for the ‘Galaxies’ Category

Hubble hits the Red Limit. Next up: Webb Telescope

January 26, 2011 Leave a comment

hubble space telescope in orbit
The day had to come, and we all knew it. Hubble Space Telescope has been squinting for years, and now it’s reached the limit of its power to see back to the earliest epochs of cosmic time. As in Cosmic Time, or the amount of time elapsed since the Big Bang.

Today, a team of scientists made this exciting announcement:

SANTA CRUZ, CA–Astronomers studying ultra-deep imaging data from the Hubble Space Telescope have found what may be the most distant galaxy ever seen, about 13.2 billion light-years away. The study pushed the limits of Hubble’s capabilities, extending its reach back to about 480 million years after the Big Bang, when the universe was just 4 percent of its current age.

A story on Bad Astronomy explains the details, as does a NASA press release and one from the University of California, Santa Cruz. And the First Galaxies website provides even deeper scientific background in plain English.

As light from a distant galaxy speeds toward us, it gets stretched, or “redshifted,” by the expansion of space itself. Astronomers measure redshift with a quantity called “z.” The paper in Nature reports a redshift of z=10. 3. The first galaxies probably formed 200 to 300 million years post-Big Bang, which is more z’s than Hubble can deliver. To get to that redshift, Hubble would need instruments that can see even redder — more redshifted — light than it can now. So, in short, Hubble is at the “red limit” of what it can see.

I asked Jason Tumlinson, a galaxy researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute to explain:

“My opinion is that we’re very near the limits of what HST can do in terms of pushing back the redshift frontier, and in fact have been operating at HST’s limits for several years. Everything depends on the performance of the cameras, and the major upgrade provided by the new Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) in 2009 has made a big difference.”

The upgraded WFC3 was installed on Hubble during the final servicing mission in May 2009.

I asked Amber Straughn, a Goddard astrophysicist in the Observational Cosmology Laboratory and a member of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) team, to explain why Hubble has reached the “red limit” of its seeing ability:

“The short answer is, at z~10, we are AT the limit of HST’s ability to look back in time. The reason for this is simply due to HST’s wavelength coverage. The light from these very distant galaxies is very, very red — and HST’s (Wide Field Camera 3) filters cut off at around 1.7 microns. . . .That’s the ‘red limit’ of HST.”

See Dr. Straughn talk to a TV reporter about the Webb Telescope.

Another issue, Tumlinson says, is the amount of Hubble telescope time available. The light-sensing detectors on Hubble contribute a certain amount of electronic “noise” that can swamp the signal from whatever you happen to be observing. To overcome this, astronomers have to schedule enough “Hubble time” to make sure the signal from the astronomical target is sufficiently stronger than the background noise – sort of like the way you have to raise your voice to be heard in a noisy room.

Tumlinson explains:

“The detector itself adds noise to the measurement — called readout noise, generally — which is an important factor in setting the faintest observable source. Of course, HST users could go deeper and push further with longer observations so that they collect more source counts relative to this noise term, but only so much time is available. “

NASA and the scientific community saw Hubble’s red limit coming. So they invented the James Webb Space Telescope. With its huge collecting mirror — 6.5 meters (21.3 feet) in diameter — and ultrasensitive infrared detectors, Webb can see longer, redder wavelengths of light, and “redder” translates to “more distant.”

Tumlinson explains:

“Discovering galaxies at high redshift is one of the top reasons NASA is building JWST. Being much larger and optimized for this sort of work, Webb should make z ~ 10 detections routine, and could push the frontier to z = 12, 15, or even higher.”

Z=15 is around 275 million years after the Big Bang — the sweet spot for observing the first stars and galaxies forming. Stay tuned!

OH AND DID I MENTION? All opinions and opinionlike objects in this blog are mine alone and NOT those of NASA or Goddard Space Flight Center. And while we’re at it, links to websites posted on this blog do not imply endorsement of those websites by NASA.

</p> <div><a href=”” mce_href=””><img src=”″ mce_src=”″ style=”border: 0″ mce_style=”border: 0″ alt=”W3Counter” /></a></div> <p>

Swift and the Star-Eaters of the Cosmos: A New X-ray Census Reveals Secrets of Supermassive Black Holes Burning, Burning Brightly

May 27, 2010 4 comments
When galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes in their centers can light up as brilliantly bright galactic beacons.

When galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes in their centers can light up as brilliantly bright cosmic beacons.

I once was blind, but now I see. Astronomers who study the supermassive black holes beaming brightly at the centers of galaxies will be singing this line from “Amazing Grace” now.

Researchers using the Swift orbiting observatory demonstrated a way to detect virtually every supermassive black hole actively feeding on gas in nearby galaxies.

These galactic grazers are known in astrogeekspeak as “active galactic nuclei.” Active indeed! Imagine a mob of King Henry the 8ths tearing into railcars full of mutton, spewing gristle and gnawed leg bones in all directions. Active galactic nuclei — let’s just call them AGNs — are messy, voracious eaters, too, but they spew energy instead of table scraps. They can radiate more energy than all the billions of stars in the galaxy combined.


Blogolicious Active Galactic Nuclei facts

  • Large galaxies contain supermassive black holes, with a million to a billion times the sun’s mass.
  • About 1% of the black holes are active galactic nuclei (AGNs), feeding on gas and emitting vast energy.
  • A survey by NASA’s Swift satellite finds that a quarter of AGNs are within merging galaxies or close pairs.
  • This is strong evidence for the theory that mergers trigger active galactic nuclei.


But I digress: back to Swift.

A team of scientists observed the local universe with Swift’s Burst Alert Telescope (BAT), which sees in so-called hard X-rays. Those are the energetic rays that zip through your body during a medical scan. And what the scientists observed is that about a quarter of AGNs are in merging galaxies or close pairs of galaxies grabbing gravitationally at each other.

[Imagine loud “ah hah!” sound emanating collectively from the world’s galactic astronomers.]

Theorists have always said that most AGNs are probably powered by mergers. As the galaxies come together, it stirs up gas, which feeds the black holes. Now we have the “hard” (X-ray) evidence, and 6 years worth.

A sample of mergers-with-AGN found in the Swift hard X-ray census.

A sample of mergers-with-AGN found in the Swift census.

Once upon a time, many astronomers would have said that AGNs were fueled by stars being torn part near the supermassive black hole. This provides years worth of fuel. The shredded star spirals down into the hole to near-light speed, releasing gobs and gobs of energy.

This hypothesis is not off the royal banquet table just yet. Some AGNs may, in fact, be star gobblers. But the Swift result sure makes it look like many — maybe most? — AGNs trace to mergers.

With the Swift survey, astronomers have the cosmic equivalent of a well-done national census. Like good census data, it allows us to spot statistical trends and convince ourselves they are real. In this case, the trend is that many galaxies with AGNs are merging or closely interacting.

In contrast, observing galaxies at energies lower than hard X-rays can throw off a census. That’s because lower-energy light can be absorbed by all the gas and stuff tossed around by a merger. As a result, you may miss some of the AGNs.  Also, the AGNs bright optical emission can get lost in the overall glow of stars in the galaxy.

Look for the findings in the June 20 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters, if you care to graze on some real astrophysics.

ROLL THE CREDITS . . . Gogblog gratefully tips his supermassive hat to the study’s lead author, Michael Koss, a graduate student at the University of Maryland in College Park. He explained the science to Gogblog and reviewed the post for accuracy. Other members of the team include Richard Mushotzky and Sylvain Veilleux at the University of Maryland, College Park, and Lisa Winter at the Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy at the University of Colorado in Boulder.

OH AND DID I MENTION? All opinions and opinionlike objects in this blog are mine alone and NOT those of NASA or Goddard Space Flight Center.

</p> <div><a href=”” mce_href=””><img src=”″ mce_src=”″ style=”border: 0″ mce_style=”border: 0″ alt=”W3Counter” /></a></div> <p>